A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

article thumbnail

Kung Fu

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

You’re not allocating enough costs to gross margin or the cost to acquire a customer. You can start by selling to small customers and evolve to larger ones, because you’re starting with a low cost-basis and then maturing your product and service. The customer should derive 10x more value than it costs them. Karma works.

Restful 202
article thumbnail

Startup Therapy: Ten questions to ask yourself every month

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

This gets you to crystallize what cost-centric activities would most help your business. Which of your business operations do you hate? Part of why you're in business for yourself is creating something from scratch and delighting customers, but the fact is that most business operations just suck. It could be an intern.

Startup 315
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

More money if you do, more money if you don’t

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

Today you have a business plan, featuring a plausible growth trajectory (neither too conservative nor too optimistic), and an associated cost structure to drive signups and service customers. Costs arise ahead of associated revenue, especially for SaaS companies, so you need a cash investment to fund that growth.

Revenue 270
article thumbnail

Visualizing the Interactions Between CAC, Churn and LTV

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

If you like this, go see his Shockwave Innovations blog ) Anyone that has taken an accounting class or learned basic business financials knows the interaction between key elements of a P&L (revenue, cost, expense) and a balance sheet (assets, liabilities, equity). At that point, you’ve recovered the cost to acquire the customer.

article thumbnail

The unprofitable SaaS business model trap

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

I know the argument: The pay-back period on sales, marketing, and up-start costs is long, but there’s a profitable result at the end of the tunnel. The mindset works like this: It costs a lot of money to land an enterprise customer. So these costs are amortized over the customers you do land. for every $1.00 Just wait!

article thumbnail

Not disruptive, and proud of it

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

billion market cap), mid-sized (NetBotz with millions in revenue and funding), and small (sub-$1m operations like us). They were the disruptors, but they didn't profit from the disruption. Disruptive technology often comes from research groups commissioned to produce innovative ideas but unable to capitalize on them.

article thumbnail

Which is better: Many customers at low price-point or few at high price?

A Smart Bear: Startups and Marketing for Geeks

For example, the average cost of customer acquisition diminishes. Suppose you discover that it costs $60 to acquire a new $10/mo customer which is too much to be sustainable — perhaps, but that cost diminishes over time, so it’s not a long-term problem. You spend less on marketing/advertising/acquisition.

Customer 320