article thumbnail

Why Startups Should Raise Money at the Top End of Normal

Both Sides of the Table

Another firm we saw tried to raise $15 million at a $60 million pre-money with similar metrics. They did an inside round, spent a bunch of money and then went through a fire sale of the business less than 2 years later. And the CEO they would hire to come in and run the business when you go would always be a mercenary.

article thumbnail

Current Startup Market Emotional Biases

Feld Thoughts

Also, they have a strong belief that any sign of weakness (such as a down round) will have a catastrophic impact on their culture, hiring process, and ability to retain employees. Their own ego is also a factor – will a down round signal weakness?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

People-First Capitalism

Reid Hoffman

And I hired a COO, Belinda Johnson , and she said, “No, if people don’t like you, you should meet with them.” The burden [should] just be that we care; that if we learn something, we improve it, and that we don’t only use single output metrics and its growth at all costs. That was totally counterintuitive. And I said, “Why?”

article thumbnail

Startup Fairy Tales and Other Tall Tales That Venture Capitalists Tell

Growthink Blog

Yes, you heard me right – multiple research studies, including from the Kauffman Foundation , have shown that when you remove a follow-on venture capital round from a founder or angel investor-funded company, that expected returns skyrocket. It is driven by the following: • The Best Metric for the Health of a Company is Cash Flow.

article thumbnail

People-First Capitalism

Reid Hoffman

And I hired a COO, Belinda Johnson , and she said, “No, if people don’t like you, you should meet with them.” The burden [should] just be that we care; that if we learn something, we improve it, and that we don’t only use single output metrics and its growth at all costs. That was totally counterintuitive. And I said, “Why?”

article thumbnail

The Future of Startups 2013-2017

Scalable Startup

And so the other reason that I am very interested in delving deep into this space is that it seems like IPOs like Workday, Palo Alto Networks are sort of — they have metrics and analytics that Wall Street understands, more so than a Facebook; like “We are going to sell X number of this in the next year.”

article thumbnail

On the Road to Recap:

abovethecrowd.com

Also, they have a strong belief that any sign of weakness (such as a down round) will have a catastrophic impact on their culture, hiring process, and ability to retain employees. Their own ego is also a factor – will a down round signal weakness? A down round is nothing.

IPO 40