Remove 1999 Remove Dilution Remove Distribution Remove Naming
article thumbnail

Want to Know How VC’s Calculate Valuation Differently from Founders?

Both Sides of the Table

Back in 1999 when I first raised venture capital I had zero knowledge of what a fair term sheet looked like or how to value my company. I told them that True Ventures had stuck to their brand name and submitted a totally clean term sheet. This states how the proceeds from a sale or dissolution of the company will be distributed.

Valuation 405
article thumbnail

Should You Share Equity with Consultants?

www.inc.com

Naming a Business. Before Roving Software could receive its first round of financing from professional investors, in early 1999, he had to put all the stock arrangements in writing. Besides the future potential earnings youre forgoing, youre also diluting your own ownership in the company. Tools & Research. Newsletters.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

On the Road to Recap:

abovethecrowd.com

In 1999, record valuations coexisted with record IPOs and shareholder liquidity. If 1999 was a wet (read liquid) bubble, 2015 was a particularly dry one. Back in 1999, if a company raised $30mm before an IPO, that was considered a large historic raise. It will also minimize future dilution. 2015 was the exact opposite.

IPO 40
article thumbnail

Does Elon Musk + Peter Thiel = 3 or 1.5

Professor VC

Not surprisingly, the merger was highly dilutive, particularly to Confinity/PayPal shareholders. Luckily, Google was one of the 150 and did ultimately return the fund assuming the LP was smart enough to hold the stock after distribution. At the IPO, Musk held a 14.2% stake vs Thiel's 5.6% (Sequoia Capital had 10.7%).

Merger 28