2001 Finance Naming Term Sheet 
Both Sides of the Table
JULY 29, 2010
We received so much positive feedback from our This Week in Venture Capital show walking through valuation calculations & term sheets that we decided to do a Q&A show this week to address topics that entrepreneurs want to learn about. We will continue to do more of this. I eventually needed more money. Check ‘em out!
Both Sides of the Table
OCTOBER 19, 2009
I had previously raised VC in 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2005. My blog linked to Brad Feld’s blog because I was so grateful for his series on term sheets and he was one of the biggest reasons that as a VC I felt compelled to blog. I had kept a personal blog for more than a year and was new at keeping a professional blog.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
finance.fortune.cnn.com
AUGUST 21, 2012
Term Sheet. Term Sheet The latest on private equity, M&A, deals and movements — from Wall Street to Silicon Valley. Exclusive: Returns for brand-name VC funds By Dan Primack August 20, 2012: 12:15 PM ET. Crosslink Ventures IV (2001): 246% (104%). General Catalyst II (2001): 149% (53%).
Both Sides of the Table
FEBRUARY 8, 2010
But what about once you have a term sheet? They made great introductions, they helped you get financed, the put in more money themselves, they helped you strategically and they helped you with your exit. My chips were down in late 2000 / early 2001. For some reason most entrepreneurs do. Don’t let that be you.
Eric Friedman
AUGUST 18, 2021
In 2007, he was named the Anne Armstrong Leadership Fellow, a position given annually to the most promising young foreign policy professional. On Describing His Current Work without Naming His Fund/Investments. This doesn’t concern any specific industry, but that kind of behavioral finance. Dan has a B.A. That scares me.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
282 
Let's personalize your content