Remove 2006 Remove Later Stage Remove Management Remove Partner
article thumbnail

Does the Size of a VC Fund Matter?

Both Sides of the Table

It in not uncommon to see a VC talk about “total assets under management&# as in “We have $1.5 billion under management.&# I don’t really understand why VCs do this since it’s mostly a meaningless number. What is total assets under management? - So VCs often raise money every 3-5 years if they can.

article thumbnail

Looking for Funds in All the Right Places

Austin Startup

Collectively they have $850M in capital in their most recent funds: [link] Both Silverton Partners and LiveOak Venture Partners have filed regulatory documents associated with new fundraising efforts in 2017 so we should all look forward to announcements from them on successfully raising new funds. Corsa Ventures fits this criteria.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

As Populist as it May Feel, 98% of VCs Aren’t Dumb

Both Sides of the Table

After all, I am no stranger to the publicly expressing the frustrations of dealing with the downside of this industry as I wrote about in 2006 when I was an entrepreneur. But the larger funds usually have lower returns because they are often investing bigger dollars at later stages with less risk and therefore lower returns.

LP 374
article thumbnail

New money into venture explains ups and downs in the market

The Equity Kicker

A lot of them are focused on Series A investing and favour the ecommerce and marketplace sectors that Forward Partners focuses on. Mark also notes that startup valuations went up 3x from 2006-2015, and simple supply and demand logic suggests the non-VC cash in the market was important in driving prices up.

article thumbnail

The Seeds Have Changed: An Epilogue to The New Venture Landscape

K9 Ventures

As the check size increases, investors tend to look for more traction, established revenue models, proven unit-economics, and other metrics that were previously associated with later stage companies. Moving up stream is a natural evolution of a venture fund, especially as you get more money and more partners.

article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Branding Startups and Communities

Both Sides of the Table

So many had names of partners (Kleiner Perkins) or local favorite identifiers like trees (Sequoia). You could argue that choosing the name “first round” paints them into a corner in case they want to ever do a late stage fund, but I suspect they named it FRC precisely because they wanted to excel at early-stage investing.

Community 304
article thumbnail

Where are the Deals? How VCs Identify the Next Generation of Startups

David Teten

The venture capital industry is continuing its evolution from an upside-down pyramid (typically 3-10 Partners, plus some administrative support) to a traditional hierarchical pyramid. 2006) [iii]. Investors with dedicated, large-scale sourcing teams are almost all top-quartile performers across stage, vintage, and sector.