Remove Down Round Remove Later Stage Remove Metrics Remove Revenue
article thumbnail

Why Startups Should Raise Money at the Top End of Normal

Both Sides of the Table

The earlier you invest the higher the chances the company won’t work out and thus you pay a lower price than later-stage investors. I raised my A round at a $31.5 million post-money valuation with no revenue. Another firm we saw tried to raise $15 million at a $60 million pre-money with similar metrics.

article thumbnail

To Follow On or Not to Follow On

This is going to be BIG.

There are a lot of people that artificially group together performance metrics for venture, and try to extrapolate successful stratagies from it. In the late 90's, it wasn't surprising that companies with no revenue that were funded at 100 million dollar valuations didn't survive. If you're a multi-stage investor, I get this.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

On the Road to Recap:

abovethecrowd.com

A high performing, high-growth SAAS company that may have been worth 10 or more times revenue was suddenly worth 4-7 times revenue. Also, they have a strong belief that any sign of weakness (such as a down round) will have a catastrophic impact on their culture, hiring process, and ability to retain employees.

IPO 40
article thumbnail

Unicorpse

Feld Thoughts

Some will demonstrate strategically justifiable metrics and have fantastic ‘up round’ exits; others may see liquidation preferences kick in which will negatively impact founders and employees; others may fulfill the adage “IPO is the new down round” , which has been the case for more than half of the public companies on our list. .”