article thumbnail

5/25-NYC – Investing in Intellectual Capital: Patents, Trademarks, Domain Names, Litigation, Government Rights, and other Intangible Assets

David Teten

Kupietzky has spoken extensively on the value of domain names and has appeared on CNN and CNBC and has been quoted by numerous print sources including Investors Business Daily , The New York Times and The Los Angeles Business Journal. Prior to joining Boeing, Mr. Location: Pillsbury Winthrop, 1540 Broadway, New York at 45th Street.

Naming 122
article thumbnail

After 20 years: Updating the Berkus Method of valuation

Berkonomics

Originally created in the mid 1990’s to help with the imprecise problem of how to value early stage companies, especially those in technology, I developed what soon became known as “The Berkus Method” when published in the popular book, “Winning Angels” by Harvard’s Amis and Stevenson with my permission in 2001.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

In Defense of the IPO and How to Improve It, Part 2: Peeking Behind the Pop

Ben's Blog

IPO “over-subscription” has also become a vanity metric for the bankers and the issuing company. Interestingly the data for the 1990-98 and 2001-19 time periods are roughly the same – approximately one-quarter of deals priced above the initial filing range. A similar pattern persists in the 2000s. from 2010-2019.

IPO 36
article thumbnail

The Yo-Yo Life of a Tech Entrepreneur – A Cautionary Tale

Both Sides of the Table

I flew from San Diego (where I was visiting for Thanksgiving) to New York to persuade investors to stick with us. Then I got engaged to be married in late 2001 and had the motivation to get really serious. This no doubt upset my mom but luckily my girlfriend (now my wife) saw what I was going through and understood.

article thumbnail

Which Are More Legible: Serif or Sans Serif Typefaces?

alexpoole.info

2001 ; Tullis et al., 2000-2001 , Tullis et al., Although studies of screen reading show no difference between reading from screen and from paper ( Dillon, 1992 ; Bernard, 2001 ), there could be some validity to this argument. However, this has not been borne out by recent evidence ( Bernard, 2001 , Boyarski et al.,