Remove Agile Remove Networking Remove Technology Remove Ukraine
article thumbnail

Hacking for Defense @ Stanford – Making the World a Safer Place

Steve Blank

Up until the dawn of the 21 st century, they defined military technology superiority. Our defense and intelligence community owned and/or could buy and deploy the most advanced technology in the world. Not only were they insulated from technological disruption, they were often also the disrupters. Its Not Just the Technology.

article thumbnail

Lessons for the DoD – From Ukraine and China

Steve Blank

Looking at a satellite image of Ukraine online I realized it was from Capella Space – one of our Hacking for Defense student teams who now has 7 satellites in orbit. National Security is Now Dependent on Commercial Technology. Portions of this post previously appeared in War On the Rocks. government satellite in orbit.

Ukraine 289
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

How To Create a Web App

www.readwriteweb.com

Posted by: Neil | October 4, 2007 2:24 AM I am not sure if I am misreading this - but are you suggesting that a top down, water fall process works better then an agile /iterative development approach? I think, if you can swing it, the first round of the core technology / IP should be developed by the founders.

Web 40
article thumbnail

The Power of “In Person” – Why Distributed Teams are Less Effective

Both Sides of the Table

There is a core that exists in human connectedness that no amount of technology can replace. For me one of the tell tale signs of a real entrepreneur is that they know how to network well enough to find technical talent to join them. I’ve seen it go full cycle. What about offshoring?